BluSkyi·Engineering Insight Article
Carbon Capture · Biomethanation · Membrane Separation
Pilot Links Membrane CO2 Capture to Microbes That Make Grid-Quality Methane
A pilot at a Greek lignite power station coupled a two-stage membrane unit, an electrolyser and trickle-bed bioreactors, turning concentrated CO2 into methane above 95% purity once the microbes were properly fed.
- Source Journal
- Renewable Energy
- Lead Institution
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
- Published
- 16 June 2026
- Discipline
- Environmental
- Focus Area
- Carbon Capture & Emissions Control
- Research Type
- Applied
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Authors
- Koutsiantzi et al.
The Bottom Line
The chain works, with conditions attached. A two-stage polyimide membrane unit reached 94.3% CO2 purity at 71% recovery, but only from a 27% CO2 feed; at 15% it managed 70.4%. Downstream, trickle-bed reactors fed that CO2 with electrolytic hydrogen held methane above 95% at a two-hour gas retention time. The authors estimate pilot capture cost at 150–200 €/t CO2, with compression electricity the main driver. Richer CO2 sources suit the membrane stage best.
Key Findings · At a Glance
- The two-stage membrane unit reached 94.3% CO2 purity with 71% recovery from a 27% CO2/73% N2 feed.
- At a 15% CO2 feed the same configuration delivered only 70.4% purity, below the 90% needed for methanation.
- Optimal stage pressures were identified as 5.5 bar for the first stage and 1.9 bar for the second.
- Biomethanation reactors fed at a 4:1 H2:CO2 ratio produced gas above 95% methane at a two-hour retention time.
- At two hours, a stable methane production rate of 2.28 m3 CH4 per m3 reactor per day was achieved.
- Falling iron and nickel levels coincided with volatile fatty acid build-up; correcting nutrient supply restored stability.
- Preliminary pilot capture cost was estimated at 150–200 €/t CO2, dominated by electricity for gas compression.
Opportunity
Lignite-fired power plants remain among the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, and the authors frame post-combustion capture as particularly relevant to such hard-to-abate sources. The incumbent route, amine absorption, is the most mature but carries a solvent regeneration penalty the authors cite as 3–4 GJ per tonne of CO2, alongside corrosion, degradation and footprint. Membranes are less mature, at an estimated technology readiness of 6–7, but are compact, modular, solvent-free and can be retrofitted without major plant redesign.
Capture alone leaves the question of what to do with the CO2. Biological methanation offers one answer: hydrogenotrophic microbes combine CO2 with hydrogen to make methane under mild conditions, and the authors note the process tolerates common flue gas impurities. The product can substitute for natural gas in existing grids. The catch is that the microbes need a concentrated, steady CO2 supply, while flue gas typically carries between 7% and nearly 30% CO2.
The team, led from Aristotle University of Thessaloniki with the Hellenic Agricultural Organisation Dimitra and Public Power Corporation of Greece, set out to close that gap. After single-stage laboratory trials, they built a pilot of four hollow-fibre polyimide modules in two stages and connected it at the Agios Dimitrios power plant to a proton exchange membrane electrolyser and two 0.10 m3 trickle-bed reactors running at 55°C. The authors describe the continuous on-site coupling as a first for Greece.
Results
Separation hinges on the feed
In the laboratory, a single membrane stage gave CO2 purities of only 15.5% to 38.6%, with the familiar trade-off: higher pressure raised recovery but diluted the permeate. At pilot scale, with the first stage held at 5.5 bar, raising second-stage pressure across 1.0 to 3.2 bar on a 15% CO2 feed increased recovery (range 18.4% to 51.1%) while purity stayed between 67.2% and 72.2%. Recycling second-stage retentate barely moved purity (up 0.3%) but raised second-stage recovery from 41.9% to 49%.
Crossing the 90% threshold
None of those runs cleared 90% purity, the minimum the authors set for downstream methanation. Cutting the feed flow to 5.5 L/min and enriching the feed did. Purity rose from 70.4% at 15% CO2 to 83.8% at 20%, 93.7% at 24% and 94.3% at 27%, where recovery was 71%. The authors judge purity close to amine absorption, but recovery below the 99% they cite for that technology.
Microbes need feeding
Fed at a 4:1 hydrogen-to-CO2 ratio, the reactors produced gas above 95% methane. Each cut in gas retention time caused a dip: below 90% moving from four to three hours, below 80% moving to two hours. Both times, methane recovered above 90% within about a week and then climbed back above 95% (after 11 days at three hours); after the final cut it held above 95% for the rest of the four-month campaign. At two hours the reactors sustained 2.28 m3 of methane per m3 of reactor per day, which the authors place within the reported range for biological methanation. The instability at three hours tracked volatile fatty acid build-up, which the authors attribute to competing homoacetogenic bacteria as iron and nickel fell to 4.8 and 0.18 mg/L. Optimising nutrient supply restored stable operation.
First cost read
A preliminary estimate puts pilot capture cost at 150–200 €/t CO2, above the 50–80 €/t the authors cite for large-scale industrial post-combustion capture but within the range they cite for early-stage demonstrations. Electricity for gas compression dominated.
The Practical Applications
Cement and high-CO2 industry
The authors conclude the membrane stage is more effective for flue gases above 20% CO2 and name cement plants as an example. Such sources would need less enrichment to reach the purity methanation demands.
Thermal power operators
For plants facing residual emissions, the pilot shows a modular capture unit can be installed on an existing site. The results suggest pre-treatment to raise CO2 concentration would be needed for lower-strength flue gas.
Biogenic CO2 streams
The authors propose the same chain for anaerobic digestion off-gas, biomass combustion flue gas and fermentation CO2, which would make the methane route fully renewable.
Energy storage and remote grids
Coupled to electrolysis, the system stores electricity as grid-injectable methane. The authors see it as a scalable option for non-interconnected regions and islands.
Assessment
The authors are explicit that their cost figures are preliminary and that further techno-economic work is needed. Future work will scale the membrane unit to industrial flue gas capacities, add detailed techno-economic and sensitivity analysis, and complete a full life cycle assessment. Savings from scaling up by 10–100 times are left for future work, and they flag investigation of flue gas pre-treatment options.
Readers should note that the separation trials used synthetic CO2/N2 mixtures designed to imitate flue gas rather than reporting performance on raw flue gas, and binary mixtures omit the oxygen and secondary pollutants the authors themselves say real treatment must handle. The 90% purity target was met only at 24% CO2 and above, well over the 10–15% the authors describe as typical of low-concentration industrial flue gas. Recovery of 71% also leaves 29% of the CO2 in the feed uncaptured. The biological side is the more encouraging result: stable grid-quality methane at a two-hour retention time, provided trace metals are actively managed.
About the Research
Conducted by Chrysovalantou Koutsiantzi and colleagues at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, with researchers from the Soil and Water Resources Institute of the Hellenic Agricultural Organisation Dimitra and Public Power Corporation of Greece. Published open access in Renewable Energy under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.
Citation
Koutsiantzi, C., Lamprinidou, E., Chatzis, A., Xirostylidou, A., Kontogiannopoulos, K. N., Kougias, P. G., Antoniadis, A., Roumpos, C., & Zouboulis, A. I. (2026). Pilot-scale demonstration of an integrated membrane–biomethanation process for post-combustion CO2 capture and utilization with green hydrogen. Renewable Energy, 273, 126080.